Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The HC declined to finally adjudicate merits in a duty-drawback fraud challenge and permitted the petitioner-alleged controller of multiple entities and IECs who purportedly obtained duty drawbacks without actual supply-to institute an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) by 15 October 2025 in accordance with the statute and rules. If the appeal is lodged by that date it shall not be rejected as time-barred but shall be adjudicated on its merits. The HC expressly refrained from making binding findings, noting any interim observations will not govern the Commissioner (Appeals)'s final adjudication. The writ petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.