Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, holding that amounts paid to the seller were subject to tax deduction at source at 3.12% in accordance with the lower deduction certificate issued under section 197. The Tribunal found no short deduction of TDS, noting that a co-purchaser had identical documentation and that a prior NFAC order adopting the same conclusion in respect of the same seller remained unchallenged by the revenue. Differential treatment was therefore impermissible. Consequential addition for alleged short deduction was deleted and the appellant's deduction practice was held to be in compliance with statutory requirements; appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
