Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
