https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92239 ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes. en-us Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:38 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92239 ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes. Highlights Income Tax Fri, 05 Sep 2025 08:10:38 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92239