Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
