Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT allowed the assessee's additional claim, holding that while the AO may lack jurisdiction to adjudicate an additional claim absent a revised return, the appellate authority possesses jurisdiction to admit such a claim. The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessee's contention that she is a not-ordinarily-resident and not a resident, and that certain foreign income should therefore not be taxable in India. The appeal was remitted to the AO for a limited purpose: to verify the assessee's period of stay from 01.04.2005 to 31.03.2012 under section 6(6) of the Income-tax Act, determine residential status, and grant any reliefs as per law. Grounds 1 and 2 were allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
