Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned execution order. The Court held that where interest exceeds Rs.50,000 in a financial year, TDS is mandatorily deductible; here the aggregate interest was Rs.3,90,700 and each claimant's share exceeded Rs.50,000, thus the petitioner's 20% TDS deduction was lawful. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the claimants. The impugned order of the ADJ is unsustainable and is vacated. The claimants remain at liberty to pursue any refund remedy before the Income Tax Department in accordance with statutory procedure.
The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned execution order. The Court held that where interest exceeds Rs.50,000 in a financial year, TDS is mandatorily deductible; here the aggregate interest was Rs.3,90,700 and each claimant's share exceeded Rs.50,000, thus the petitioner's 20% TDS deduction was lawful. The executing court erred in directing refund of Rs.78,150 to the claimants. The impugned order of the ADJ is unsustainable and is vacated. The claimants remain at liberty to pursue any refund remedy before the Income Tax Department in accordance with statutory procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
