Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
HC allowed petition in part and ordered conditional release of...
Petitioner granted conditional release of imported artwork; must deposit Rs.2,00,000 differential duty and Rs.30,000 under Section 125, Customs Act, 1962
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
HC allowed petition in part and ordered conditional release of the imported artwork to the petitioner, finding no conclusive evidence as to foreign origin and noting the valuer's Rs.30 lakh estimate was prima facie speculative. The petitioner must make an ad hoc deposit of Rs.2,00,000 towards differential duty and deposit Rs.30,000 as the redemption fee under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. Release is subject to those deposits and to any further orders of the HC. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
HC allowed petition in part and ordered conditional release of the imported artwork to the petitioner, finding no conclusive evidence as to foreign origin and noting the valuer's Rs.30 lakh estimate was prima facie speculative. The petitioner must make an ad hoc deposit of Rs.2,00,000 towards differential duty and deposit Rs.30,000 as the redemption fee under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. Release is subject to those deposits and to any further orders of the HC. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.