Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
The HC allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found the show-cause notice dated 12.03.2024 legally defective because it afforded a 30-day reply period but fixed an earlier personal hearing within that period, rendering the notice bad in law; the petitioner offered no explanation for non-submission of a written response. Consequently, the HC quashed the 12.03.2024 notice and the consequential order dated 02.05.2024, but expressly left open the respondent's liberty to issue a fresh valid show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.
The HC allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration. The court found the show-cause notice dated 12.03.2024 legally defective because it afforded a 30-day reply period but fixed an earlier personal hearing within that period, rendering the notice bad in law; the petitioner offered no explanation for non-submission of a written response. Consequently, the HC quashed the 12.03.2024 notice and the consequential order dated 02.05.2024, but expressly left open the respondent's liberty to issue a fresh valid show-cause notice and proceed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
