Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice requiring a reply within 30 days but fixing a personal hearing before expiry of that period was legally valid, and whether the consequential order cancelling GST registration could stand.
Analysis: The notice granted 30 days to submit a reply, yet directed appearance before the jurisdictional officer on a date falling within that period. The notice also contemplated ex parte decision only upon failure to reply or appear within the stipulated time. In these circumstances, the notice was held to be bad in law, and the cancellation order, being founded on that defective notice, could not survive.
Conclusion: The show cause notice was quashed, and the cancellation order was also quashed. Liberty was left to the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice.