Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC dismissed the petitioner's writ insofar as it sought premature interference with the respondent's tax notice, holding that the petitioner failed to file the requisite reply to the impugned notice dated 18.03.2025 and thus cannot seek relief before the Court without exhausting the statutory process. The Court found that the petitioner bears the evidentiary burden to substantiate entitlement to the lower TDS rate where the seller's PAN was not linked to Aadhaar at the relevant time. The HC directed the Petitioner to file a substantive reply with supporting documents within two weeks of receipt of this order, and directed the Respondent to consider that reply and pass a decision expeditiously.
The HC dismissed the petitioner's writ insofar as it sought premature interference with the respondent's tax notice, holding that the petitioner failed to file the requisite reply to the impugned notice dated 18.03.2025 and thus cannot seek relief before the Court without exhausting the statutory process. The Court found that the petitioner bears the evidentiary burden to substantiate entitlement to the lower TDS rate where the seller's PAN was not linked to Aadhaar at the relevant time. The HC directed the Petitioner to file a substantive reply with supporting documents within two weeks of receipt of this order, and directed the Respondent to consider that reply and pass a decision expeditiously.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
