Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under s.147 was invalid where the AO sat on information from the Investigation Wing for over four years and did not satisfy conditions of the first proviso to s.147 before issuing notice; the assessee had fully disclosed purchases in the return filed u/s 139(1) and produced delivery challans, receipts and particulars of subsequent sales, and there was no legal obligation to furnish third-party confirmations at that stage. The reassessment framed u/s 143(3)/147 and the ad hoc profit enhancement were quashed as bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under s.147 was invalid where the AO sat on information from the Investigation Wing for over four years and did not satisfy conditions of the first proviso to s.147 before issuing notice; the assessee had fully disclosed purchases in the return filed u/s 139(1) and produced delivery challans, receipts and particulars of subsequent sales, and there was no legal obligation to furnish third-party confirmations at that stage. The reassessment framed u/s 143(3)/147 and the ad hoc profit enhancement were quashed as bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
