Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under s.147 was invalid where the AO sat on information from the Investigation Wing for over four years and did not satisfy conditions of the first proviso to s.147 before issuing notice; the assessee had fully disclosed purchases in the return filed u/s 139(1) and produced delivery challans, receipts and particulars of subsequent sales, and there was no legal obligation to furnish third-party confirmations at that stage. The reassessment framed u/s 143(3)/147 and the ad hoc profit enhancement were quashed as bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT held that the reopening of assessment under s.147 was invalid where the AO sat on information from the Investigation Wing for over four years and did not satisfy conditions of the first proviso to s.147 before issuing notice; the assessee had fully disclosed purchases in the return filed u/s 139(1) and produced delivery challans, receipts and particulars of subsequent sales, and there was no legal obligation to furnish third-party confirmations at that stage. The reassessment framed u/s 143(3)/147 and the ad hoc profit enhancement were quashed as bad in law, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
