Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upheld one addition and deleted another: the addition under s.69C r.w.s.115BBE relating to unexplained expenditure was sustained against the assessee because seized records bore the statutory presumption under s.292C and the assessee failed to discharge the onus to furnish convincing evidence; conversely the addition under s.40A(3) for cash payment of wages/salary was deleted since the assessee's explanation supported by books of account was disclosed to the Revenue and the books were not rejected under s.145, rendering the addition unjustified.
ITAT upheld one addition and deleted another: the addition under s.69C r.w.s.115BBE relating to unexplained expenditure was sustained against the assessee because seized records bore the statutory presumption under s.292C and the assessee failed to discharge the onus to furnish convincing evidence; conversely the addition under s.40A(3) for cash payment of wages/salary was deleted since the assessee's explanation supported by books of account was disclosed to the Revenue and the books were not rejected under s.145, rendering the addition unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
