HC dismissed the petition and upheld earlier appellate orders...
Petition dismissed; appellate orders upholding confiscation of undeclared imported jewellery and denial of duty-free allowance under Baggage Rules affirmed
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC dismissed the petition and upheld earlier appellate orders confirming confiscation of undeclared imported jewellery and denial of duty-free allowance under the applicable notification and Baggage Rules. The Court held that pendency or prospect of a review does not stay implementation of the appellate order, noting the Appellate Authority's findings that the Petitioner is not a habitual offender nor prima facie part of a smuggling syndicate. The Petitioner remains liable for applicable warehousing charges from the date of detention and for any redemption fine or penalty as determined. The detaining authority is directed to release the goods on verification of the Petitioner's credentials. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.