Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Code to entertain and adjudicate the IA enforcing the arbitral award against the Corporate Debtor. The arbitral award is final and unchallenged; the Resolution Professional is entitled to prosecute enforcement for revival of the Corporate Debtor, and the Adjudicating Authority may direct the judgment-debtor to pay the award sum. The tribunal affirmed that the IBC's time-bound regime prevails and that alleged delay in issuing the award vis-Ã -vis the MSME Act's 90-day aspiration does not vitiate the award or preclude enforcement. Consequently, the impugned order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal and upheld the Adjudicating Authority's jurisdiction under Section 60(5) of the Code to entertain and adjudicate the IA enforcing the arbitral award against the Corporate Debtor. The arbitral award is final and unchallenged; the Resolution Professional is entitled to prosecute enforcement for revival of the Corporate Debtor, and the Adjudicating Authority may direct the judgment-debtor to pay the award sum. The tribunal affirmed that the IBC's time-bound regime prevails and that alleged delay in issuing the award vis-Ã -vis the MSME Act's 90-day aspiration does not vitiate the award or preclude enforcement. Consequently, the impugned order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
