Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upheld initiation of reassessment under s.147/s.148, finding nondisclosure of a transfer of immovable property and resultant capital gains in the return. Noting the assessee's ex parte conduct before the AO and CIT(A), the Tribunal confirmed reopening but, in the interest of natural justice, directed the AO to verify payment of Rs.5,00,000 by cheque in May 2010 to original owners; if established as consideration, the amount is to be allowed as deduction under s.48 against deemed sale consideration determined under s.50C. Observing repeated opportunities afforded to the assessee, the ITAT restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication on merits and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.
ITAT upheld initiation of reassessment under s.147/s.148, finding nondisclosure of a transfer of immovable property and resultant capital gains in the return. Noting the assessee's ex parte conduct before the AO and CIT(A), the Tribunal confirmed reopening but, in the interest of natural justice, directed the AO to verify payment of Rs.5,00,000 by cheque in May 2010 to original owners; if established as consideration, the amount is to be allowed as deduction under s.48 against deemed sale consideration determined under s.50C. Observing repeated opportunities afforded to the assessee, the ITAT restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication on merits and allowed the appeal for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.