The ITAT held that the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the assessee's...

The ITAT held that the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the assessee's application under section 80G(5)(iii) due to a typographical mistake indicating section 80G(5)(ii). The tribunal recognized the error and directed the assessee to submit a fresh application in Form No. 10AB under section 80G(5)(iii). The CIT(E) was instructed to adjudicate the revised application on its merits in accordance with law. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, effectively setting aside the initial rejection and providing the assessee an opportunity to rectify the procedural defect.

---