Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC quashed and set aside the cancellation orders of multiple Bills of Entry dated 20.6.2017, holding that the rate of customs duty is determined by the date of filing the original Bill of Entry for home consumption under Section 46 of the Customs Act. The Court emphasized that subsequent change in ownership does not affect the applicable duty rate. The respondents were directed to apply the customs duty rate prevailing on 20.6.2017, the date when the goods entered for home consumption and the Bill of Entry was presented. The petition was allowed accordingly.
The HC quashed and set aside the cancellation orders of multiple Bills of Entry dated 20.6.2017, holding that the rate of customs duty is determined by the date of filing the original Bill of Entry for home consumption under Section 46 of the Customs Act. The Court emphasized that subsequent change in ownership does not affect the applicable duty rate. The respondents were directed to apply the customs duty rate prevailing on 20.6.2017, the date when the goods entered for home consumption and the Bill of Entry was presented. The petition was allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
