Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The appellant's challenge to the refusal of renewal of its CHA license was dismissed. The appellant failed to comply with the High Court's directive to appear before the licensing authority on the specified date, and did not disclose the pendency of the appeal against the commissioner's order refusing renewal. Consequently, the High Court did not interfere with the original rejection order, which remains unchallenged and final. The appellant also failed to inform the tribunal of any subsequent developments arising from the High Court's directive. In light of these circumstances and the High Court's judgment upholding the order, the tribunal held that the appeal lacked merit and dismissed it, affirming the rejection of the license renewal application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.