Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The HC dismissed the petition seeking modification of the order adjudicating a composite SCN against the Petitioners and challenging the vires of N/N. 06/2020-Central Tax. The Court held that under Section 2(4) of the CGST Act, the Adjudicating Authority excludes the Appellate Authority, which has full power to consider the matter afresh on appeal under Section 107. The adjudication order was detailed and considered the Petitioners' submissions, including those related to multiple financial years. The legislative intent prohibits remanding the matter back to ensure finality, but the Appellate Authority may confirm, modify, or annul the order on merits. Reliance on precedents affirmed the wide scope of appellate powers under Section 107(11). Consequently, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the application for modification.
The HC dismissed the petition seeking modification of the order adjudicating a composite SCN against the Petitioners and challenging the vires of N/N. 06/2020-Central Tax. The Court held that under Section 2(4) of the CGST Act, the Adjudicating Authority excludes the Appellate Authority, which has full power to consider the matter afresh on appeal under Section 107. The adjudication order was detailed and considered the Petitioners' submissions, including those related to multiple financial years. The legislative intent prohibits remanding the matter back to ensure finality, but the Appellate Authority may confirm, modify, or annul the order on merits. Reliance on precedents affirmed the wide scope of appellate powers under Section 107(11). Consequently, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the application for modification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
