Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (7) TMI 1395 - HC - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        HC upholds powers of Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) CGST Act to reconsider cases afresh The HC dismissed the petition seeking modification of the order upholding the vires of the composite SCN issued for multiple financial years. The Court ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          HC upholds powers of Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) CGST Act to reconsider cases afresh

                          The HC dismissed the petition seeking modification of the order upholding the vires of the composite SCN issued for multiple financial years. The Court held that the Adjudicating Authority is distinct from the Appellate Authority, which has full power to consider the matter afresh, including all submissions and evidence. The embargo against remanding the matter aims to ensure finality and prevent repetitive proceedings. Citing precedents, the Court affirmed that the Appellate Authority's powers under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act include re-examining the merits and reconsidering the Adjudicating Authority's reasoning. Consequently, the Court declined to interfere and dismissed the application.




                          ISSUES:

                            Whether an order passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) can be challenged before the High Court when it is appealable under Section 107 of the Act.Whether the Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act is empowered to consider the reply or representation filed before the Adjudicating Authority during the appeal proceedings.Whether the Appellate Authority's powers under Section 107(11) of the CGST Act include the ability to confirm, modify, or annul the order on merits without remanding the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority.Whether the vires of Notification No. 06/2020-Central Tax dated 03rd February, 2020 can be adjudicated comprehensively along with the merits of the matter in the present proceedings.

                          RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

                            The Court held that the impugned order was an appealable order under Section 107 of the CGST Act, and hence the proper remedy was to approach the Appellate Authority; the High Court declined to entertain the challenge to the adjudication order and limited notice to the challenge against the impugned notification.The Appellate Authority under Section 107(11) has the power to "confirm, modify or annul the decision or order appealed against" and is thus empowered to consider the entire matter afresh, including the reply filed before the Adjudicating Authority, and not merely the adjudicating order.The provision in Section 107(11) prohibiting remand back to the Adjudicating Authority is intended to ensure finality and prevent repetitive reconsideration; therefore, the Appellate Authority must decide the appeal on merits, including evidence and submissions, and not merely review the adjudicating order in isolation.The Court refused to modify the earlier order and dismissed the application, reiterating that the Petitioner is entitled to avail appellate remedy in accordance with law as directed earlier.

                          RATIONALE:

                            The Court relied on the statutory framework of the CGST Act, particularly Sections 2(4), 5(4), 74(9), and 107(11), to delineate the roles and powers of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority.Section 2(4) defines the Adjudicating Authority and excludes the Appellate Authority from this definition, establishing their distinct functions.Section 74(9) mandates the proper officer (Adjudicating Authority) to consider the representation (reply) made by the person chargeable with tax before issuing an order.Section 107(11) confers wide powers on the Appellate Authority to pass such orders as it thinks just and proper, including confirming, modifying, or annulling the order without remanding the matter back, thereby empowering it to consider the entire merits and evidence afresh.The Court referred to precedent interpreting analogous provisions under the Customs Act and CGST Act, which affirm the wide amplitude of appellate powers to decide matters on merits and discourage remand, to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure finality.The Court rejected the contention that the Appellate Authority cannot consider the reply filed before the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing that the appeal is a "full-fledged first appeal" and the Appellate Authority is empowered to rectify errors made by the Adjudicating Authority.

                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found