Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal filed on 13.02.2025, challenging the order regarding tax imposition and recovery of money allegedly obtained through unlawful means. The Court emphasized the necessity for the appellate authority to act in a time-bound manner and to decide the matter on merits in accordance with law, taking into account relevant judicial precedents cited by the petitioner. The petition was allowed, mandating cooperation from the respondent and ensuring the appeal process proceeds without undue delay.
The HC issued a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petitioner's appeal filed on 13.02.2025, challenging the order regarding tax imposition and recovery of money allegedly obtained through unlawful means. The Court emphasized the necessity for the appellate authority to act in a time-bound manner and to decide the matter on merits in accordance with law, taking into account relevant judicial precedents cited by the petitioner. The petition was allowed, mandating cooperation from the respondent and ensuring the appeal process proceeds without undue delay.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.