Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT held that amounts collected as fines, penalties, liquidated damages, or forfeiture of deposits from contractors for failure to meet contractual obligations do not constitute consideration for taxable services under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. Such amounts are penal in nature, intended to compensate for losses or deter breaches, and lack nexus with any service rendered. Consequently, these amounts cannot be classified as "Declared Services" under Section 66E(e) without an independent agreement to tolerate or refrain from an act. The tribunal affirmed that no service was performed corresponding to these charges, and thus no service tax demand under Section 66E(e) is maintainable. The impugned order demanding service tax on such amounts was quashed, and the appeal was allowed.
The CESTAT held that amounts collected as fines, penalties, liquidated damages, or forfeiture of deposits from contractors for failure to meet contractual obligations do not constitute consideration for taxable services under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994. Such amounts are penal in nature, intended to compensate for losses or deter breaches, and lack nexus with any service rendered. Consequently, these amounts cannot be classified as "Declared Services" under Section 66E(e) without an independent agreement to tolerate or refrain from an act. The tribunal affirmed that no service was performed corresponding to these charges, and thus no service tax demand under Section 66E(e) is maintainable. The impugned order demanding service tax on such amounts was quashed, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.