Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned assessment order issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act due to the petitioner's submission of a Chartered Accountant's certificate confirming supplies, receipt of goods, and payment including GST, despite the supplier's liquidation. The Court noted that initiation of proceedings solely for non-furnishing of the certificate was unwarranted, especially given Circular No.183/15/2022-GST allowing transaction verification by the respondent. The matter was remanded with directions to treat the proceedings as initiated under Section 73 of the CGST Act and to decide afresh in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, requiring the respondent to reconsider the case and pass appropriate orders under Section 73.
The HC set aside the impugned assessment order issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act due to the petitioner's submission of a Chartered Accountant's certificate confirming supplies, receipt of goods, and payment including GST, despite the supplier's liquidation. The Court noted that initiation of proceedings solely for non-furnishing of the certificate was unwarranted, especially given Circular No.183/15/2022-GST allowing transaction verification by the respondent. The matter was remanded with directions to treat the proceedings as initiated under Section 73 of the CGST Act and to decide afresh in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, requiring the respondent to reconsider the case and pass appropriate orders under Section 73.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
