Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The HC set aside the impugned assessment order issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act due to the petitioner's submission of a Chartered Accountant's certificate confirming supplies, receipt of goods, and payment including GST, despite the supplier's liquidation. The Court noted that initiation of proceedings solely for non-furnishing of the certificate was unwarranted, especially given Circular No.183/15/2022-GST allowing transaction verification by the respondent. The matter was remanded with directions to treat the proceedings as initiated under Section 73 of the CGST Act and to decide afresh in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, requiring the respondent to reconsider the case and pass appropriate orders under Section 73.
The HC set aside the impugned assessment order issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act due to the petitioner's submission of a Chartered Accountant's certificate confirming supplies, receipt of goods, and payment including GST, despite the supplier's liquidation. The Court noted that initiation of proceedings solely for non-furnishing of the certificate was unwarranted, especially given Circular No.183/15/2022-GST allowing transaction verification by the respondent. The matter was remanded with directions to treat the proceedings as initiated under Section 73 of the CGST Act and to decide afresh in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand, requiring the respondent to reconsider the case and pass appropriate orders under Section 73.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
