Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
HC set aside orders of appellate authority and proper officer rejecting petitioner's partial refund claim and input tax credit entitlement. Court held that insertion of Section 16(5) in WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 with retrospective effect from 1st July, 2017 significantly altered scope of Section 16(4) application. The amendment extended filing deadline for returns under Section 39 for tax periods 2017-18 through 2020-21 until 30th November, 2021. Orders dated 21st February, 2024 and 14th April, 2023 were unsustainable given retrospective statutory changes. Matter remanded to proper officer for re-adjudication considering Section 16(5) insertion. Petition disposed of favorably for petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.