Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging addition under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE for unexplained credits. Upon conversion from private company to LLP, assessee transferred share capital, reserves and surplus to partners' accounts. AO alleged violation of Section 47(xiiib)(f) conditions prohibiting distribution of accumulated profits within three years of conversion, making addition under Section 68. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held Section 47 pertains only to capital gains computation under Section 45, not unexplained credits under Section 68. The transferred amounts had identifiable nature and source, being company's own accumulated profits. Addition was erroneously made in assessee's hands when credits appeared in partners' accounts. None of Section 68's ingredients were satisfied as credits were not unexplained. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging addition under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE for unexplained credits. Upon conversion from private company to LLP, assessee transferred share capital, reserves and surplus to partners' accounts. AO alleged violation of Section 47(xiiib)(f) conditions prohibiting distribution of accumulated profits within three years of conversion, making addition under Section 68. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held Section 47 pertains only to capital gains computation under Section 45, not unexplained credits under Section 68. The transferred amounts had identifiable nature and source, being company's own accumulated profits. Addition was erroneously made in assessee's hands when credits appeared in partners' accounts. None of Section 68's ingredients were satisfied as credits were not unexplained. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.