Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging addition under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE for unexplained credits. Upon conversion from private company to LLP, assessee transferred share capital, reserves and surplus to partners' accounts. AO alleged violation of Section 47(xiiib)(f) conditions prohibiting distribution of accumulated profits within three years of conversion, making addition under Section 68. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held Section 47 pertains only to capital gains computation under Section 45, not unexplained credits under Section 68. The transferred amounts had identifiable nature and source, being company's own accumulated profits. Addition was erroneously made in assessee's hands when credits appeared in partners' accounts. None of Section 68's ingredients were satisfied as credits were not unexplained. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld.
ITAT allowed assessee's appeal challenging addition under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE for unexplained credits. Upon conversion from private company to LLP, assessee transferred share capital, reserves and surplus to partners' accounts. AO alleged violation of Section 47(xiiib)(f) conditions prohibiting distribution of accumulated profits within three years of conversion, making addition under Section 68. CIT(A) deleted the addition. ITAT held Section 47 pertains only to capital gains computation under Section 45, not unexplained credits under Section 68. The transferred amounts had identifiable nature and source, being company's own accumulated profits. Addition was erroneously made in assessee's hands when credits appeared in partners' accounts. None of Section 68's ingredients were satisfied as credits were not unexplained. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.