Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed assessee's claim for Rs. 707.56 crores loss arising from Harshad Mehta scam during FY 1991-92. Assessee paid SBI for back-to-back securities transactions, but SBI fraudulently credited proceeds to broker's account without delivering securities to assessee. Tribunal held the loss constituted allowable business expenditure in the relevant assessment year, being attributable to fraudulent activities by employees. Following precedent in J&K Bank Ltd case and Tribunal's earlier decision in assessee's own matter, ITAT determined loss was deductible business expense rather than capital loss. Addition made by revenue authorities was deleted and assessee's grounds were allowed. Loss deemed allowable in year of occurrence despite fraudulent circumstances surrounding transaction.
ITAT allowed assessee's claim for Rs. 707.56 crores loss arising from Harshad Mehta scam during FY 1991-92. Assessee paid SBI for back-to-back securities transactions, but SBI fraudulently credited proceeds to broker's account without delivering securities to assessee. Tribunal held the loss constituted allowable business expenditure in the relevant assessment year, being attributable to fraudulent activities by employees. Following precedent in J&K Bank Ltd case and Tribunal's earlier decision in assessee's own matter, ITAT determined loss was deductible business expense rather than capital loss. Addition made by revenue authorities was deleted and assessee's grounds were allowed. Loss deemed allowable in year of occurrence despite fraudulent circumstances surrounding transaction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.