<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Rs. 707.56 crore loss from Harshad Mehta scam allowed as deductible business expenditure</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89936</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s claim for Rs. 707.56 crores loss arising from Harshad Mehta scam during FY 1991-92. Assessee paid SBI for back-to-back securities transactions, but SBI fraudulently credited proceeds to broker&#039;s account without delivering securities to assessee. Tribunal held the loss constituted allowable business expenditure in the relevant assessment year, being attributable to fraudulent activities by employees. Following precedent in J&amp;K Bank Ltd case and Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in assessee&#039;s own matter, ITAT determined loss was deductible business expense rather than capital loss. Addition made by revenue authorities was deleted and assessee&#039;s grounds were allowed. Loss deemed allowable in year of occurrence despite fraudulent circumstances surrounding transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=832592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Rs. 707.56 crore loss from Harshad Mehta scam allowed as deductible business expenditure</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89936</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed assessee&#039;s claim for Rs. 707.56 crores loss arising from Harshad Mehta scam during FY 1991-92. Assessee paid SBI for back-to-back securities transactions, but SBI fraudulently credited proceeds to broker&#039;s account without delivering securities to assessee. Tribunal held the loss constituted allowable business expenditure in the relevant assessment year, being attributable to fraudulent activities by employees. Following precedent in J&amp;K Bank Ltd case and Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision in assessee&#039;s own matter, ITAT determined loss was deductible business expense rather than capital loss. Addition made by revenue authorities was deleted and assessee&#039;s grounds were allowed. Loss deemed allowable in year of occurrence despite fraudulent circumstances surrounding transaction.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:43:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>