Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed revision petition in money laundering case where petitioner was not arrested during ED investigation under Section 19 PMLA but summoned by Special Court. Despite filing bail application and separate petition for release under Section 91 BNSS, Special Court rejected bail applying rigorous Section 45(1) PMLA provisions while ignoring Section 91 application. HC held that when ED chose not to arrest accused during investigation despite serious allegations, Special Court erred in applying PMLA bail restrictions instead of mandatory release under Section 91 BNSS upon bond execution as mandated by Supreme Court precedent in Tarsem Lal. Court distinguished case from situations involving non-bailable warrants for evasive accused, concluding petitioner entitled to immediate release on bond under BNSS provisions regardless of allegation gravity.
HC allowed revision petition in money laundering case where petitioner was not arrested during ED investigation under Section 19 PMLA but summoned by Special Court. Despite filing bail application and separate petition for release under Section 91 BNSS, Special Court rejected bail applying rigorous Section 45(1) PMLA provisions while ignoring Section 91 application. HC held that when ED chose not to arrest accused during investigation despite serious allegations, Special Court erred in applying PMLA bail restrictions instead of mandatory release under Section 91 BNSS upon bond execution as mandated by Supreme Court precedent in Tarsem Lal. Court distinguished case from situations involving non-bailable warrants for evasive accused, concluding petitioner entitled to immediate release on bond under BNSS provisions regardless of allegation gravity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
