Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT's order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee's claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT's order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee's claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
