<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT quashes revision order under section 263 for reassessment proceedings allowing interest claim under section 24B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89751</link>
    <description>ITAT quashed PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT&#039;s order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee&#039;s claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:26:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=831225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT quashes revision order under section 263 for reassessment proceedings allowing interest claim under section 24B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89751</link>
      <description>ITAT quashed PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 challenging validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 153A regarding computation of total income claiming interest u/s 24B. Tribunal held that Explanation 2 invoked by PCIT had no application as all relevant documents were filed by assessee during reassessment proceedings, which AO verified before finalizing assessment allowing interest claim u/s 24B. ITAT noted AO had previously allowed similar interest claim in AY 2012-13, establishing continuing cause of action that cannot be disturbed without different factual findings. Tribunal found PCIT&#039;s order reflected non-application of mind since AO had conducted adequate inquiries and examination of assessee&#039;s claims during both original and reassessment proceedings u/s 153A, taking plausible view not prejudicial to Revenue interests. Appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 08:26:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>