Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance of standard asset provisions under section 36(1)(via), syndication fees for convertible cumulative preference shares under section 37(1) as capital expenditure, and rates expenses under section 40(a). The tribunal held that PCIT failed to establish twin conditions required for section 263 - that AO's order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest. AO had taken plausible view on issues raised, and assessee's representative provided relevant material establishing order was not erroneous. PCIT cannot exercise revisionary powers merely based on different perspective when original assessment order addressed issues adequately. Following Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. precedent, revisionary jurisdiction requires satisfaction of both conditions simultaneously, which were not met in this case.
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance of standard asset provisions under section 36(1)(via), syndication fees for convertible cumulative preference shares under section 37(1) as capital expenditure, and rates expenses under section 40(a). The tribunal held that PCIT failed to establish twin conditions required for section 263 - that AO's order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest. AO had taken plausible view on issues raised, and assessee's representative provided relevant material establishing order was not erroneous. PCIT cannot exercise revisionary powers merely based on different perspective when original assessment order addressed issues adequately. Following Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. precedent, revisionary jurisdiction requires satisfaction of both conditions simultaneously, which were not met in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
