Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance of standard asset provisions under section 36(1)(via), syndication fees for convertible cumulative preference shares under section 37(1) as capital expenditure, and rates expenses under section 40(a). The tribunal held that PCIT failed to establish twin conditions required for section 263 - that AO's order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest. AO had taken plausible view on issues raised, and assessee's representative provided relevant material establishing order was not erroneous. PCIT cannot exercise revisionary powers merely based on different perspective when original assessment order addressed issues adequately. Following Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. precedent, revisionary jurisdiction requires satisfaction of both conditions simultaneously, which were not met in this case.
ITAT quashed PCIT's revision order under section 263 regarding disallowance of standard asset provisions under section 36(1)(via), syndication fees for convertible cumulative preference shares under section 37(1) as capital expenditure, and rates expenses under section 40(a). The tribunal held that PCIT failed to establish twin conditions required for section 263 - that AO's order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interest. AO had taken plausible view on issues raised, and assessee's representative provided relevant material establishing order was not erroneous. PCIT cannot exercise revisionary powers merely based on different perspective when original assessment order addressed issues adequately. Following Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. precedent, revisionary jurisdiction requires satisfaction of both conditions simultaneously, which were not met in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
