Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT partially allowed the customs broker's appeal against license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition. The tribunal found that while the broker failed to discharge obligations under Regulation 10(d), (e) & (n) of CBLR 2018 and attempted to aid an importer in bypassing policy restrictions, the revenue failed to prove violations warranting license cancellation. Though the broker acted in good faith, certain unexplained grey areas demonstrated insufficient diligence in client obligations and justifying the "H" card authorization. CESTAT modified the impugned order by setting aside license revocation and security deposit forfeiture while reducing the penalty to Rs.5,000 as deterrent measure. Appeal disposed.
CESTAT partially allowed the customs broker's appeal against license revocation, security deposit forfeiture, and penalty imposition. The tribunal found that while the broker failed to discharge obligations under Regulation 10(d), (e) & (n) of CBLR 2018 and attempted to aid an importer in bypassing policy restrictions, the revenue failed to prove violations warranting license cancellation. Though the broker acted in good faith, certain unexplained grey areas demonstrated insufficient diligence in client obligations and justifying the "H" card authorization. CESTAT modified the impugned order by setting aside license revocation and security deposit forfeiture while reducing the penalty to Rs.5,000 as deterrent measure. Appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
