Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT upheld the service tax demand against a non-banking financial company for collection of receivables, classifying the service under "banking and other financial services" rather than "collection agency services". The Tribunal confirmed the Principal Commissioner's jurisdiction to issue show-cause notices, validated the tax assessment using weighted average method, and determined that the collection charges constituted taxable consideration. While rejecting additional claims regarding liquidity facility taxation, the Tribunal found the valuation method reasonable and dismissed both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals, maintaining the original tax assessment.
CESTAT upheld the service tax demand against a non-banking financial company for collection of receivables, classifying the service under "banking and other financial services" rather than "collection agency services". The Tribunal confirmed the Principal Commissioner's jurisdiction to issue show-cause notices, validated the tax assessment using weighted average method, and determined that the collection charges constituted taxable consideration. While rejecting additional claims regarding liquidity facility taxation, the Tribunal found the valuation method reasonable and dismissed both the appellant's and Revenue's appeals, maintaining the original tax assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
