Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that a partner can file a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act without explicit firm authorization. The complaint against corporate directors was deemed maintainable under Section 141, with specific averments establishing accountability. Moratorium under IBC Section 14 does not bar criminal proceedings against directors for cheque dishonor. The court rejected the application to quash the complaint, finding no jurisdictional infirmity in the proceedings and affirming the partner's implied authority to initiate legal action on behalf of the partnership firm.
HC held that a partner can file a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act without explicit firm authorization. The complaint against corporate directors was deemed maintainable under Section 141, with specific averments establishing accountability. Moratorium under IBC Section 14 does not bar criminal proceedings against directors for cheque dishonor. The court rejected the application to quash the complaint, finding no jurisdictional infirmity in the proceedings and affirming the partner's implied authority to initiate legal action on behalf of the partnership firm.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
