Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC validated the sale and transfer of 234,000 equity shares based on a pre-existing contractual agreement. The Applicants exercised an irrevocable call option under the MOU after the company's failure to infuse agreed funds. The court determined that the transaction was bona fide, initiated prior to winding up proceedings, and completed in accordance with crystallized contractual rights. Applying Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, the court ratified the share transfer, recognizing that strict interpretation could potentially paralyze business operations during liquidation proceedings. The application was ultimately allowed, affirming the Applicants' right to complete the share transfer.
HC validated the sale and transfer of 234,000 equity shares based on a pre-existing contractual agreement. The Applicants exercised an irrevocable call option under the MOU after the company's failure to infuse agreed funds. The court determined that the transaction was bona fide, initiated prior to winding up proceedings, and completed in accordance with crystallized contractual rights. Applying Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, the court ratified the share transfer, recognizing that strict interpretation could potentially paralyze business operations during liquidation proceedings. The application was ultimately allowed, affirming the Applicants' right to complete the share transfer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
