Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning CENVAT credit refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. The tribunal found that the appellant had correctly followed prescribed procedures for input credit and periodic returns for June 2017. The decision recognized the transitional provisions from the old tax regime to GST, holding that existing Central Excise Act conditions would apply except for the unjust enrichment clause. The tribunal determined that the legal framework sufficiently supports cash refund of excess CENVAT credit during the GST transition, thereby invalidating the lower appellate authority's order rejecting the refund claim.
CESTAT allowed the appeal concerning CENVAT credit refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017. The tribunal found that the appellant had correctly followed prescribed procedures for input credit and periodic returns for June 2017. The decision recognized the transitional provisions from the old tax regime to GST, holding that existing Central Excise Act conditions would apply except for the unjust enrichment clause. The tribunal determined that the legal framework sufficiently supports cash refund of excess CENVAT credit during the GST transition, thereby invalidating the lower appellate authority's order rejecting the refund claim.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
