Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC held that customs authorities possess jurisdiction to issue show cause notices under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 regarding misrepresentation of Regional Value Content in imported tin ingots. The court rejected petitioners' argument about Article 24 of ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA), emphasizing that international treaty provisions require formal transformation into domestic law to be invocable. Without statutory incorporation, specialized dispute resolution mechanisms cannot preclude domestic legal proceedings. The court affirmed the principle that treaty norms must be explicitly adopted into municipal legal framework to gain justiciability. Consequently, the petition challenging customs authorities' jurisdiction was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
