Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
CESTAT dismissed revenue's appeals regarding Target Plus Scheme (TPS) utilization. The tribunal found that imported plastic granules had a legitimate nexus with ready-made garment exports, as confirmed by DGFT's acceptance of license conditions. The court emphasized that imported goods under TPS must be for actual use by importers or supporting manufacturers. The decision aligned with precedent in similar cases, specifically referencing a prior ruling involving Sunstar Overseas Ltd. The tribunal validated the assessee's compliance with TPS and Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) requirements, consequently rejecting revenue's proposed proceedings and upholding the original license benefits.