Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT held that imported Styrene Butadiene Copolymer (SBC) should be classified under CTH 3903 instead of CTH 4002. The tribunal found that since styrene monomer predominates (>70% by weight), the product must be treated as a "polymer of styrene" with characteristics more akin to plastic than rubber. The revenue failed to conduct independent testing or provide expert technical opinion to substantiate alternative classification. The extended period of limitation was not applicable as there was no deliberate misdeclaration. Consequently, the demand of differential duty, interest, penalties, and goods confiscation were set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed, affirming classification under CTH 3903.
CESTAT held that imported Styrene Butadiene Copolymer (SBC) should be classified under CTH 3903 instead of CTH 4002. The tribunal found that since styrene monomer predominates (>70% by weight), the product must be treated as a "polymer of styrene" with characteristics more akin to plastic than rubber. The revenue failed to conduct independent testing or provide expert technical opinion to substantiate alternative classification. The extended period of limitation was not applicable as there was no deliberate misdeclaration. Consequently, the demand of differential duty, interest, penalties, and goods confiscation were set aside. The appellant's appeal was allowed, affirming classification under CTH 3903.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
