Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of benefits under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Multiple HCs, including Madras, Bombay, Gujarat, and Delhi, have consistently held that technical delays in payment due to COVID-19 pandemic should not disqualify applicants. The court found that denying scheme benefits would be contrary to the scheme's objectives and unjust to the eligible declarant. The impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim was quashed, with directions to accept the payment and issue a discharge certificate. The time limit provisions were deemed directive in nature, allowing flexibility in implementation.
HC allowed the petition challenging the rejection of benefits under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. Multiple HCs, including Madras, Bombay, Gujarat, and Delhi, have consistently held that technical delays in payment due to COVID-19 pandemic should not disqualify applicants. The court found that denying scheme benefits would be contrary to the scheme's objectives and unjust to the eligible declarant. The impugned order rejecting the petitioner's claim was quashed, with directions to accept the payment and issue a discharge certificate. The time limit provisions were deemed directive in nature, allowing flexibility in implementation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
