Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Customs Assessment Portal centralises classification and valuation guidance to support consistent, transparent and informed compliance across stakehol...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.
ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
