<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Voluntary ITR Revision Pre-Notice Shields Assessee from Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89183</link>
    <description>ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=827494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Voluntary ITR Revision Pre-Notice Shields Assessee from Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89183</link>
      <description>ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not sustainable when assessee voluntarily revised ITR before notice u/s 153A and the additional income was accepted by AO without specific linkage to seized materials. The tribunal followed precedent establishing that revised return post-search takes place of original return, and higher income declaration does not automatically attract penalty. Appeal by assessee allowed, penalty deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 08:32:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>