Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC granted regular bail in a narcotic smuggling case, finding procedural violations under NDPS Act. The court determined that the applicant was held in illegal custody from 21.05.2023 to 25.05.2023, violating constitutional rights under Articles 21 and 22. Despite Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions, bail was granted due to significant procedural non-compliance, including delayed reporting, non-production within 24 hours, and absence of prior information documentation. The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a matching surety, subject to trial court conditions. Bail application was allowed, recognizing fundamental rights and procedural irregularities in the detention process.
HC granted regular bail in a narcotic smuggling case, finding procedural violations under NDPS Act. The court determined that the applicant was held in illegal custody from 21.05.2023 to 25.05.2023, violating constitutional rights under Articles 21 and 22. Despite Section 37 NDPS Act restrictions, bail was granted due to significant procedural non-compliance, including delayed reporting, non-production within 24 hours, and absence of prior information documentation. The applicant was directed to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a matching surety, subject to trial court conditions. Bail application was allowed, recognizing fundamental rights and procedural irregularities in the detention process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
