Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT upheld the Respondent Bank's right to invoke a continuing personal guarantee against the Appellant despite auction proceedings. The Tribunal determined that the guarantee agreement remained legally binding, with clauses explicitly stating the guarantee's continuity irrespective of principal borrower's discharge or legal operations. Explanation (b) of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was interpreted to exclude court-ordered monetary recoveries from debt calculations. Consequently, the Appellant's arguments challenging the guarantee's enforceability were rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as meritless, affirming the bank's absolute right to pursue recovery through the personal guarantee.
NCLAT upheld the Respondent Bank's right to invoke a continuing personal guarantee against the Appellant despite auction proceedings. The Tribunal determined that the guarantee agreement remained legally binding, with clauses explicitly stating the guarantee's continuity irrespective of principal borrower's discharge or legal operations. Explanation (b) of Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was interpreted to exclude court-ordered monetary recoveries from debt calculations. Consequently, the Appellant's arguments challenging the guarantee's enforceability were rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as meritless, affirming the bank's absolute right to pursue recovery through the personal guarantee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
