PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
HC adjudicated a rent dispute involving a temple property, determining a retrospective rent enhancement of 15% from July 2016. The court calculated monthly rent progressively: from Rs. 1,08,059/- to Rs. 1,24,268/- (effective July 2016), then to Rs. 2,60,000/- (from March 2018), and subsequently to Rs. 2,99,000/- (from March 2021). The temple's claimed arrears of Rs. 32,74,753/- were partially acknowledged. The court directed the temple to treat previous payments as full settlement, with no further amounts payable to the bank, and recommended the temple pursue potential tax refunds through appropriate legal channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
